Jews For Islam
Muhammad in The Jewish Bible
(8) The Lord And The Prophet Of The Covenant
The last book of the Canonical Jewish Code of the Bible bears the name of "Malachai," which looks to be more asurname than a proper noun. The correct pronunciation of the name is Malakh, which means "my angel" or "my messenger ." The Hebrew word, "mal’akh," like the Arabic "malak," like the Greek term "anghelos" from which the English name "angel" is derived, signifies "a messenger ," one commissioned with a message or news to deliver to somebody.
Who this Malakhi is, in what period of the Jewish history he lived and prophesied, is not known either from the book itself or from any other portion of the Old Testament . It begins with the words: "The ’missa ’ of the Word of Yahweh the El of Israel by the hand of Malakhi," which may be translated: "The discourse of the Word of Yahweh God of Israel, by the hand of Malakhi." It contains four short chapters.
The oracle is addressed, not to a king and his courtiers, but to a people already settled in Jerusalem with the Temple and its services. The sacrifices and oblations are of the meanest and worst kind; the sheep and cattle offered at the altars are not of the best quality; they are blind, lame, and lean animals. The tithes are not regularly paid, and if at all paid are of the inferior material. The priests, too, naturally, cannot devote their time and energy to perform their sacred duty. For they cannot chew the beefsteaks and roasted mutton-chops of the lean old, crippled sacrifices. They cannot live on the scanty tithes or insufficient stipends. Yahweh, as usual with these incorrigible people, now threatens, now holds out promises, and at times complain.
This discourse, or oracle, seems to have been delivered by the Prophet Malakhi in about the beginning of the fourth century before the Christian era , when the people of Israel were also tired of Yahweh; and used to say: "The Table of the Lord (Yahweh) is an abomination, and His meal is contemptible"(Mal. i. 12). "He who doeth evil is good in the eyes of Yahweh, and He is pleased with them; or , where is the God of judgment?"(Mal. ii. 17).
The Book of Ma lakhi, notwithstanding its being of a post capt ivita tem da te, is, however , written in a seemingly good Hebrew style. To say that this "misa ," or discourse, has come down to us intact and unadulterated is to confess ignorance of the language. There are several mutilated sentences, so that it is almost impossible to understand the exact sense they intend to convey.
The subject of our discussion in this article is the famous prediction couched in Mal. iii. 1. The prophecy runs thus: -
"Behold, I send My Messenger , and he shall prepare the way before Me; and suddenly shall come to his temple the Adon whom ye are seeking, and the Messenger of the Covenant whom ye desire. Behold, he cometh, says the Lord of Hosts"(Mal. iii. 1).
This is a well known Messianic prophecy. All Christian Saints, Father s, Popes, Patriarchs, Priests, monks, nuns, and even the Sunday-school children, will tell us that the first messenger mentioned in the text is St . John the Baptist , and the second messenger , whom their vernacular versions have rendered "Angel of the Covenant ," is Jesus Christ !
A definite determination of the subject of this prophecy is of extreme importance, because the Christian Churches have ever since believed that two distinct persons are indicated therein; and the author of this erroneous belief is a singularly remarkable blunder of St . Matthew’s. One of the characteristic features of the First Gospel - Matthew - is to show and prove the fulfillment of some particular statement or prediction in the Old Testament concerning nearly every event in the life of Jesus Christ . He is very careful to guard himself against contradictions, and less scrupulous in his quotations from the Hebrew Scriptures. He is cer - ta inly not well versed in the literature of his own language. I had occasion to refer in the preceding article of this series to one of his blunders concerning the ass upon which Jesus mounted. This is a most serious point directly touching the authenticity and the validity of the Gospels. Is it possible that the Apostle Matthew should himself be ignorant of the true character of the prophecy of Malakh, and ignorantly a scribe to his master a misquotation which would naturally put to question his very quality of a divinely inspired Prophet? Then, what should we think of the author of the Second Gospel - of St . Mark - who describes the passage in Malakal to Isaiah? (Mark i. 2). Jesus is reported by Matthew (xi. 1-15), and this too is followed or copied by Luke (vii. 18-28), to have declared to the multitude that John the Baptist was "more than a Prophet ," that it was he "about whom it was written: Behold, I am sending My Angel before thy face, and he shall prepare thy way before thee;" and that "none among those born by women was greater than John, but the least in the kingdom of heaven is greater than he." The corruption of the text of Malakh is plain and deliberately made. The original text tells us that Yahweh Sabaoth, i.e. God of Hosts, is the speaker and the believers are the people addressed, as can be readily seen in the words "whom ye are seeking ... whom ye desire." God says: "Behold, I send My Messenger , and he shall prepare the way before My face." But the Gospels have interpolated the text by effacing the personal pronoun of the first person singular , and inserted "before thee" (or "thy face," as in Hebrew) twice. It is generally believed that Matthew wrote his Gospel in the then vernacular Hebrew or Aramaic in order to prove to the Jews that God, addressing Jesus Christ , said: "Behold, I send My messenger (Angel) [such is the version in Matthew xi. 10] before thee, and he shall prepare thy way before thee;" and wishes to show that this angel or messenger was John the Baptist . Then a contrast between the Prophets John and Jesus is left to Prophet Jesus, who describes John as above every prophet and greater than the songs of all human mothers, but the least in the Kingdom of Heaven - of which Jesus is meant to be the King - is greater than John.
I do not believe for a second that Jesus or any of his disciples could have made use of such language with the object of perverting the Word of God, but some fana ticalmonk or an ignorant bishop has forged this text and put into the mouth of Jesus the words which no prophet would speak.
The traditional idea that the Messenger commissioned to prepare or repair the way before the "Adon" and the "Messenger of the Covenant " is a worshiper and subordinate of the latter , and therefore to conclude that two distinct persons are predicted is a creation of the ignorance concerning the importance of the mission and the magnitude of the work assigned to that messenger . He is not supposed to be a pioneer or even an engineer appointed to construct roads and bridges for the passing of a royal procession. Let us therefore pore over this subject more deeply and in a courageous, impartial, and dispassionate manner .
1. In the first place, we must understand that the Messenger is a man, a creature of human body and soul, and that he is not an Angel or a superhuman being. In the second place, we should open our eyes of wisdom and judgment to see that he is not dispatched to prepare the way before another Messenger called "Adon" and the "Messenger of the Promise," but he is commissioned to establish a straight , safe, and good Religion. He is commissioned to remove all the obstacles in the way between God and His creatures; and to fill up all the gaps and chaos in this grandpath, so that it may be smooth, easy to walk on, well lighted, and protected from all danger . The Hebrew phrase, "u pinna derekh," means to say that the Messenger "will put straight and clear the worship or the religion." The verb "darakh" of the same root a s the Arabic "daraka ," means "to walk, reach, and comprehend;" and the substantive "derekh" signifies, "road, way, step," and metaphorically "worship and religion." It is used in this spiritual since all through the Psalms and the Prophet s. Surely this high Messenger of God was not coming to repair or reform a way, a religion for the benefit of a handful of Jews, but to establish a universal and an unchangeable religion for all men. Though the Jewish religion inculcates the existence of one true God, still their conception of Him as a national Deity of Israel, their priesthood, sacrificial rites and cere- monies, and then the non-existence of any positive articles of belief in the immortality of the soul, the resurrection of the dead, the last judgment , the eternal life in heaven or hell, and many other deficient point s, make it absolutely unfit and insufficient for the peoples of diverse languages, races, dimates, temperaments, and habits. As regards Christianity, it , with its meaningless seven sacraments, it's beliefs in original sin, the incarnation of a god - unknown to all previous religious and mythological literature and in atrinity of individual gods, and finally because it does not possess a single line in scripto from its supposed founder , Jesus Christ , ha s done no good to mankind. On the contrary, it has caused divisions and sects, all imbued with bitter feelings of hatred and rancor against each other .
The Messenger , then, was commissioned with the abrogating of both those religions and the establishing of the ancient religion of Prophets Abraham and Ishmael and the other Prophets, with new precepts for all men. It was to be the shortest road to "reach" God; the simplest religion to worship Him, and the safest Faith to remain everpure and unadulterated with superstition and stupiddogmas. The Messenger was commissioned to prepare a road, a religion that will conduct au who wish to believe in and love the One God without having need of the leadership of hundreds of self- appointed guides and pretenders. And above all, the Messenger ways to come suddenly to his temple, whether it be the one in Jerusalem or the one in Mecca ; he was to root out all idolatry in those countries, not only by the destruction of idols and images, but also inculcating in their former worshipers the faith in one true Allah. And the accomplishment of this stupendous task, namel , to construct a new Path, a universal religion, that teaches that between God and man no absolute media tor , no priest , saint or sacrament , is at all permissible, has only been done by a Prophet whose name is Muhammad al- Mustapha !
2. John the Baptist was not the Messenger foretold by Malakhi The account is given about him by the four Evangelists are very contradictory, but the one thing that they together agree on is that he prepared no way at all; for he was not accredited with a sacred scripture: he neither founded a religion nor reformed the old one. He is reported to have left his parents and home while still a youth; he lived in the desert on honey and the locust ; and spent there his life until he was about thirty years old, when he showed himself to the multitudes on the banks of the River Jordan, where he used to baptize the penitent sinners who confessed their sins to him. While Matthew knows nothing of his relationship with Jesus, or does not care to report it , Luke, who wrote his Gospel, not from a revelation, but from the works of the disciples of the Master , records the homage rendered by John to Jesus when both in the wombs of their mothers (Luke i. 39-46). He baptizes Jesus in the waters of the River Jordan like everybody else, and is reported to have said that he (John) was "not worthy to bow down to untie the laces of the shoes" (Mark i. 7) of Jesus, and according to the Fourth Gospel he (John) exclaimed that Jesus was "the Lamb of God that takes away the sins of the world" (John i. 29). That he knew Jesus and recognized him to be the Christ is quite evident . Yet when he was imprisoned he sent his disciples to Jesus, asking him: "Art thou he who is to come, or should we anticipate another one?" (Matt . xi. 3, etc.). The Baptist was martyred in the prison because he reprimanded an infidel Edomite, King Herod the Tetrarch, for having married the wife of his own brother . Thus ends, according to the narrative of the Evangelists, the life of a very chaste and holy prophet .
It is strange that the Jews did not receive John as a prophet . It is also stranger still to find that the Gospel of Barnabas does not mention the Baptist ; and what is more, it puts the words said to have been uttered by John concerning Christ into the mouth of the latter about Muhammad, the Prophet of Allah. The Quran mentions the miraculous birth of John under the name of "Yahya ," but does not refer to his mission of baptism.
The description of his sermon is given in the third chapter of Matthew. He seems to have announced the approach of the Kingdom of Heaven and the advent of a Great Messenger and Prophet of God who would baptize the believers, not with water , "but with fire and with the holy spirit ."
Now, if John the Baptist were the Messenger appointed by God to prepa re the way before Jesus Christ , and if he was his herald and subordinate, there is no sense and wisdom whatever in John to go about baptizing the crowds in the waters of a river or a pond and to occupy himself with half a dozen disciples. He ought to have immediately followed and adhered to Jesus when he had seen and known him! He did nothing of the kind! Of cour se, a Muslim a lways speaks of a prophet with utmost respect and reverence, and I am not expected to comment fur ther , a s an Ernest Renan or an indifferent cr it ic would do! But to say tha t a prophet whom they describe as a dervish (Sufi) of the wilderness clad in the skins of animals, and a dervish who comes forth and sees his "Adon" and the "Angel of the Covenant ," and then does not follow and cleave to him, is ridiculous and incredible. To think and believe that a prophet is sent by God to prepare the way, to purify and clear the religion for the coming of his superior , and then describing him as living all his life in the desert among the animals, is to tell us that he was constructing chaussees, causeways or railways, not for men, but for beasts and genii.
3. Nor was John the Baptist the Prophet Elijah or Elias, as Christ is made to have said. The Prophet Malakhi, in his fourth chapter (verses 5, 6), speaks of the coming of Elijah, which fact is foretold to take place some time before the day of the Resurrection and not before the Appearance of the Messenger in question. Even if Christ had said that John was Elijah, the people did not know him. What Jesus meant to say was that the two were similar in their ascetical life, their zeal for God, their courage in scolding and admonishing the kings and the hypocrite leaders of the religion.
I cannot go on discussing this untenable claim of the Churches concerning John being the Messenger "to prepa re the way." But I must add that this Baptist did not abrogate one iota of the Law of Moses, nor add to it a title. And a s to baptism, it is the old Jewish man ’muditha or ablution. Washing or ablution could not be considered a "religion" or "way" whose place has been taken by the famous and my- ster ious Church institution of the sacrament of Baptism!
4. If I say that Jesus Christ is not intended in the prophecy of Malakhi, it would seem that I was advancing an argument in absurdum, because nobody will contradict or make an objection to my statement . The Churches have always believed that the "Messenger of the way" is John the Baptist , and not Jesus. The Jews, however , accept neither of the two. But as the person foretold in the prophecy is one and the same, and not two, I most conscientiously declare that Prophet Jesus is not , and could not be, that person. If Jesus was a god, as he is now believed to be, then he could not be employed to prepare the way before the face of Yahweh Sabaoth! If Prophet Jesus were the Yahweh Sabaoth who made this prophecy, then who was the other Yahweh Sabaoth before whose face the way was to be prepared? If he were a simple man, made of flesh and blood, and worshiped by the Lord of Hosts, then the claim falls to the ground. For Jesus as a simple human being and prophet couldn't be the founder of the trinitarian Churches. Whichever form of the Christian religion we may take, whether it be the Orthodox, Catholic, Protestant , Salvationist , Quaker , or any of the multitudinous sects and communities, none of them can be the "way," the "religion" indicated by Malakhi; and Prophet Jesus is not it s founder or preparer . So long as we deny the absolute Oneness of God, we are in error , and Jesus cannot be our friend nor can he help us.
5. The person indicated in the prophecy has three qualifications, namely, the Messenger of Religion, the Lord Commander , and the Messenger of the Convent . He is also described and distinguished by three conditions, namely "he is suddenly coming to his Mosque or Temple, he is looked for and sought by men, and is greatly desired and coveted."
Who can, then, be this glorious man, this Great Benefactor of humanity, and this valiant Commander who rendered noble services in the cause of Allah and His religion other than Prophet Muhammad? - upon whom may rest God’s peace and blessing.
He brought to the world an unrivalled Sacred Book, Al-Qur ’an, a mostreasonable, simple, and beneficia l religion of Islam, and has been the means of guidance and conversion of millions and millions of the heathennations in all parts of the globe, and has transformed them all into one universal and united Brotherhood, which constitutes the true and formal "Kingdom of Allah" upon the earth announced by Prophets Jesus and John the Baptist . It is futile and childish to compare either Jesus or John with the great Messenger of Allah, when we know perfectly well that neither of these two did ever attempt to convert a single pagan nor succeeded in persuading the Jews to recognize his mission.